Jammu Kashmir Policy Lab

Who Rules AJK?

Political Families and the Reproduction of Power, 1974–2026

JKPL Research Report 01/26 · August 2026

Download Full Research Report (PDF)

Key Findings

Research Question

The principal research question is:

The study also examines which political families have exercised the greatest influence, the representation of political families among MLAs and senior political offices, and the mechanisms through which political influence has been reproduced across generations.

Methodology

The study employs a longitudinal mixed-methods research design covering the period 1974–2026. The quantitative component constructs a historical database of political officeholders and measures the distribution of political power across individuals and families. The qualitative component examines relationships, political succession, and institutional pathways through which political influence is reproduced.

The database distinguishes between individual politicians and office-holding events. The current Assembly dataset contains 447 membership records across the historical legislative periods examined. These are record-level events rather than 447 unique individuals.

Definition of a Political Family

For this research, a political family is defined as a family in which at least two members of the same extended family have held elected or major political office in AJK during the study period.

Family relationships are coded conservatively. Parent–child relationships, siblings, grandparent–grandchild relationships, and spouse relationships where both individuals independently held political office may be included when documented. A shared surname alone is not treated as sufficient evidence of a family relationship.

Political Power Index

The study measures political power through an office-based Political Power Index. The preliminary weighting system assigns greater values to offices carrying greater institutional authority.

The Political Power Score is calculated by summing verified office-holding events according to these weights.

Political Families in AJK

The initial examination of the 1974–2026 political-office database identifies a number of recurring political families and family networks. These include the Qayyum–Attique network, Rathore family, Sikandar Hayat family, Sultan–Tanveer–Yasir network, Farooq Haider family, Yaqoob–Zaman network, Ibrahim family, Qamar–Zia network, and Suhbat Ali–Anwar network, among others.

The families differ in size, duration, geographic base, and institutional reach. The research distinguishes family presence from family power because two Assembly members do not necessarily represent the same institutional influence as a family whose members have occupied senior executive and parliamentary offices.

Who Holds the Power?

The Political Power Index produces a substantially different picture from a simple count of Assembly members.

The 79.4% Finding

The 79.4% figure represents the share of political power contained within the family networks currently identified and verified in the dataset.

The finding therefore demonstrates concentration within the family-linked political elite rather than establishing that those families collectively control the entire political system.

How Is Power Reproduced?

1. Family Succession

Intergenerational succession can transmit political opportunity from one generation to another. An established family name may carry recognition, political relationships, organizational structures, and accumulated political experience.

2. Constituencies

Political families may develop long-term relationships with voters, local political workers, community leaders, and other intermediaries. These relationships can become associated with the wider family name.

3. Political Parties

Political families operate within the party system and depend on nominations, alliances, electoral symbols, and organizational support. Established families may also offer parties recognizable candidates with existing political networks.

4. Political Networks

Political influence can extend beyond kinship through connections with former officeholders, party leaders, ministers, legislators, local organizers, and wider social and political networks.

The study therefore understands political families as networks rather than genealogical trees alone.

Conclusion

The evidence does not support the simplistic claim that "five families rule AJK." AJK remains an electoral political system in which voters determine representation, political parties compete, governments change, and established politicians can be defeated.

At the same time, the political history examined in this study demonstrates a persistent pattern of family-based political continuity. The same political families have appeared across successive periods, reached important political offices, and, in several cases, transferred political participation from one generation to another.

The central question for AJK's future is therefore not whether political families should disappear from politics. It is whether the political system can ensure that political opportunity remains sufficiently open for both established political families and new political actors to compete on meaningful terms.

References

1. Government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, The Constitution of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, 1974, as amended.
2. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly, "Brief History."
3. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly, "Former Members."
4. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly, "Former Leaders of the House of AJK Legislative Assembly."
5. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly, "Former Speaker Assembly List."
6. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly, "Former Leaders of Opposition."
7. Daniel M. Smith, Dynasties and Democracy: The Inheritance of Power in Democratic Countries, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
8. Ernesto Dal Bó, Pedro Dal Bó, and Jason Snyder, "Political Dynasties," Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 2009.