JKPL RESEARCH PUBLICATION SERIES | RESEARCH PAPER 01 | 2026

Can AJK Become Part of Pakistan?

A Constitutional and Legal Analysis
Researcher: Qurat-ul-Ain Abid
Legal Researcher | Jammu Kashmir Policy Lab
Main Areas of Study: International Law and War Crimes
Published: August 12, 2026

Abstract

The constitutional question examined in this article is whether Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) can legally become part of Pakistan under the existing constitutional framework. Using doctrinal legal research based on the Constitution of Pakistan, the AJK Interim Constitution Act 1974, relevant constitutional materials, and the United Nations framework on Jammu and Kashmir, the study finds that AJK cannot unilaterally change its status through its Legislative Assembly, Government, or the Government of Pakistan. Article 1 of the Constitution provides a general mechanism for admitting new States or areas into the Federation, but Article 257 establishes a specific framework for Jammu and Kashmir under which the future relationship with Pakistan depends on the decision of the people of the State.

Key Findings

Finding 1: AJK cannot legally become part of Pakistan unilaterally under the existing constitutional framework.
Finding 2: The future status of Jammu and Kashmir as a whole must be determined according to the will of its people through the applicable plebiscite framework.
Finding 3: Parliament would have a central constitutional role in implementing any future relationship with Pakistan after the relevant conditions concerning accession had been satisfied.
Finding 4: Accession to Pakistan would not automatically make AJK a province of Pakistan.
Finding 5: Provincialisation would require a separate constitutional process and the necessary constitutional and legislative changes.

Conclusion

The legally defensible conclusion is that the existing law creates a conditional constitutional framework in which the will of the people of the State of Jammu and Kashmir is foundational, the institutions of Pakistan have a subsequent constitutional role, and provincialisation, if ultimately selected, would require further constitutional restructuring.

← Back to JKPL Research